News, Politics, and Culture from 14895

Photo by Mel Hunt

Bob Confer: Small town schools, world class educations

Share:

By Bob Confer

“There’s a reason Clark Kent was raised on a farm. If he was raised in Metropolis he never would have become Superman.”

Back in 2016, I had the privilege and honor of delivering the commencement address at my alma mater, Royalton-Hartland, and that statement prefaced the speech which focused on the super powers the graduates gained by being raised in a small town and educated in a small school.

The speech and the basis for it were counter to the widely-held sentiment that larger suburban schools are where it’s at. Those districts are so popular, so celebrated that many families base where they live solely on the access to what’s said to be quality schools.

That practice sometimes leads parents who remain in small towns to question if they are doing the best for their kids.

If you are one of those mothers or fathers, let me tell you this: Yes, you are.

Without a doubt, the suburban districts are quality systems, but that doesn’t mean smaller districts are inferior. As a matter of fact, small town schools offer, in their own way, compelling characteristics that make them superior to the big ones.

Out here in the country we may not have some of the resources that the high-ranking suburban schools like East Aurora, Williamsville, Clarence, and Orchard Park might possess, but we offer our students so much more.

It comes down to having access, and being a name and not a number.

In my school district, there are 1,200 students in grades kindergarten through 12, an average of 92 per grade level.

Let’s compare that to Williamsville. They have approximately 9,900 students, an average of 762 per grade.

In larger districts like that the teachers can’t know all the students, the parents and pupils can’t know all the teachers and administrators, and the students can’t know all their peers. Having the very easy chance to get lost in the shuffle has to be overwhelming to middling students or young men and women lacking in confidence or support at home.

Contrast that to smaller schools like mine. We know one another. We look out for one another. We work together to make sure no one is left behind. In a small school, students and their families have access to the educators, staff, and coaches that can’t be held in larger districts. Those educators know the kids and have watched and will watch their development every step of the way. A school becomes a family and a legacy.  

Coming with those smaller numbers and that veritable one-on-one attention is a similar and equally remarkable benefit to students: Having access to experience.

The larger schools’ sports teams, choruses, and bands could be considered havens for only the elite. Due to there being only so many available roster spots not everyone has a chance to glean the experiences of teamwork, self-discipline, self-betterment and sense of urgency that extracurricular activities provide.

That’s not the story at smaller schools. Everyone has a very real chance to acquire and strive for a place on the team or band. This gives every student the chance to become elite or put their very best effort into it – and that’s what education is all about. Similarly, smaller clubs — be it robotics or Future Farmers of America — give each participant a heightened chance to shine, lead and change the world.

Likewise, smaller peer groups lead to better access to labs, experiments, public speaking exercises and more in the classroom, all of which lead to more experience – and that’s what adds capability and productivity to the intended results of tests and standards that all schools have to master.    

I often say that the larger an organization gets – be it a business or government – the farther away it gets from the people within it, the people it is supposed to serve, and the core values that defined its foundation. There’s a reason why people don’t like Big Government or Big Business. The smaller the better.

That holds true for schools, too. So many people champion the “it takes a village to raise a child” mantra because there’s something to be had in that interpersonal, intercommunity connectedness — the direct and universal ownership of individual outcomes — that the village mentality entails. Smaller schools exist in villages and are villages unto themselves.

So, I say to the parents who wonder if they are doing right by their kids for sending them to a small school, “fret not”. Your kids are getting a world class education. They are not being denied opportunity in a small town; they are being provided it. They are receiving the access, attention and experience they deserve…all of which they will put to great use as tomorrow’s workers, volunteers, leaders and parents.

Previous Article

GoFundMe accounts opened for Erway family, and Krysta Kane, the Scio teen who was one of five children to die in house fire

Next Article

Fatal fire update: Grief counseling for first responders; Five children died including Scio student and a Wellsville student

You may also like